Essential dimension of representations of algebras
Federico Scavia

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the essential dimension of algebra representations grows with dimension, revealing that growth rates classify the algebra's representation type as finite, tame, or wild.
Contribution
It establishes a direct link between the asymptotic growth of essential dimension and the representation type of the algebra, providing a new invariant to distinguish algebras.
Findings
Bounded growth indicates finite representation type.
Linear growth corresponds to tame representation type.
Quadratic growth signifies wild representation type.
Abstract
Let be a field, a finitely generated associative -algebra and the functor , which sends a field containing to the set of isomorphism classes of representations of of dimension at most . We study the asymptotic behavior of the essential dimension of this functor, i.e., the function , as . In particular, we show that the rate of growth of determines the representation type of . That is, is bounded from above if is of finite representation type, grows linearly if is of tame representation type and grows quadratically if A is of wild representation type. Moreover, is a finer invariant of A, which allows us to distinguish among algebras of the same representation type.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
