Boundary Terms for Massive General Relativity
Gregory Gabadadze, David Pirtskhalava

TL;DR
This paper investigates the boundary terms necessary for a consistent formulation of massive gravity, revealing that additional counterterms are needed beyond the Gibbons-Hawking term to ensure a well-defined variational principle.
Contribution
It introduces novel boundary counterterms for massive gravity that ensure consistency and ghost-freedom, extending the standard boundary term analysis.
Findings
Boundary counterterms dominate over Gibbons-Hawking term in the massless limit
Additional boundary terms are required for consistency in massive gravity
The number of counterterms matches the number of bulk total derivatives involving the longitudinal mode
Abstract
It is well-known that the presence of a spacetime boundary requires the conventional Einstein-Hilbert (EH) action to be supplemented by the Gibbons-Hawking (GH) boundary term in order to retain the standard variational procedure. When the EH action is amended by the diffeomorphism-invariant graviton mass and potential terms, it naively appears that no further boundary terms are needed since all the new fields of massive gravity enter the action with the first derivative. However, we show that such a formulation would be inconsistent, even when the bulk action is ghost-free. The theory is well-defined only after introducing novel boundary counterterms, which dominate over the GH term in the massless limit and cancel the problematic boundary terms induced by the bulk action. The number of boundary counterterms equals the number of total derivatives one could construct in the bulk using…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
