Kinetic-Energy Density-Functional Theory on a Lattice
Iris Theophilou, Florian Buchholz, F. G. Eich, Michael Ruggenthaler, and Angel Rubio

TL;DR
This paper develops a lattice kinetic-energy density-functional theory and a kinetic-energy Kohn-Sham scheme, demonstrating that including kinetic-energy density as a fundamental variable improves accuracy in modeling interacting systems.
Contribution
It introduces a novel lattice kinetic-energy density-functional framework with a corresponding keKS scheme, explicitly incorporating kinetic-energy density as a fundamental variable.
Findings
The approach establishes a one-to-one correspondence between external potentials and internal variables.
Constructs simple orbital-dependent functionals that outperform standard exchange-only Kohn-Sham approximations.
Self-consistent calculations show improved accuracy over traditional density-functional methods.
Abstract
We present a kinetic-energy density-functional theory and the corresponding kinetic-energy Kohn-Sham (keKS) scheme on a lattice and show that by including more observables explicitly in a density-functional approach already simple approximation strategies lead to very accurate results. Here we promote the kinetic-energy density to a fundamental variable along side the density and show for specific cases (analytically and numerically) that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the external pair of on-site potential and site-dependent hopping and the internal pair of density and kinetic-energy density. Based on this mapping we establish two unknown effective fields, the mean-field exchange-correlation potential and the mean-field exchange-correlation hopping, that force the keKS system to generate the same kinetic-energy density and density as the fully interacting one. We show, by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
