Improving the Accuracy of Planet Occurrence Rates from Kepler using Approximate Bayesian Computation
Danley C. Hsu (1), Eric B. Ford (1), Darin Ragozzine (2, 3), Robert, C. Morehead (4) ((1) Pennsylvania State University, (2) Brigham Young, University, (3) Florida Institute of Technology, (4) Texas Tech University)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel Bayesian framework using Approximate Bayesian Computation to improve the estimation of planet occurrence rates from Kepler data, especially for small planets in habitable zones.
Contribution
The study develops a hierarchical Bayesian model with ABC and sequential importance sampling to more accurately estimate planet occurrence rates, surpassing traditional inverse detection efficiency methods.
Findings
Increased occurrence rates for small planets at larger orbital periods.
Estimated habitable zone planet occurrence rate density of 1.6^{+1.2}_{-0.5}.
Identified a local minimum in occurrence rate between 1.5 and 2 R_earth.
Abstract
We present a new framework to characterize the occurrence rates of planet candidates identified by Kepler based on hierarchical Bayesian modeling, Approximate Bayesian Computing (ABC), and sequential importance sampling. For this study we adopt a simple 2-D grid in planet radius and orbital period as our model and apply our algorithm to estimate occurrence rates for Q1-Q16 planet candidates orbiting around solar-type stars. We arrive at significantly increased planet occurrence rates for small planet candidates () at larger orbital periods (d) compared to the rates estimated by the more common inverse detection efficiency method. Our improved methodology estimates that the occurrence rate density of small planet candidates in the habitable zone of solar-type stars is per factor of 2 in planet radius and orbital period. Additionally, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
