Generalized rectifiability of measures and the identification problem

TL;DR

This paper surveys a unified framework for understanding rectifiable measures in geometric measure theory, reviewing classical results and recent advances on the identification problem for measures carried by various types of Lipschitz and Hölder images.

Contribution

It introduces a generalized rectifiability framework and synthesizes recent progress on the identification problem for Radon measures in this context.

Findings

Unified framework for rectifiability concepts

Review of classical rectifiable measure results

Summary of recent advances on the identification problem

Abstract

One goal of geometric measure theory is to understand how measures in the plane or higher dimensional Euclidean space interact with families of lower dimensional sets. An important dichotomy arises between the class of rectifiable measures, which give full measure to a countable union of the lower dimensional sets, and the class of purely unrectifiable measures, which assign measure zero to each distinguished set. There are several commonly used definitions of rectifiable and purely unrectifiable measures in the literature (using different families of lower dimensional sets such as Lipschitz images of subspaces or Lipschitz graphs), but all of them can be encoded using the same framework. In this paper, we describe a framework for generalized rectifiability, review a selection of classical results on rectifiable measures in this context, and survey recent advances on the identification problem for Radon measures that are carried by Lipschitz or H\"older or $C^{1,\alpha}$ images of Euclidean subspaces, including theorems of Azzam-Tolsa, Badger-Schul, Badger-Vellis, Edelen-Naber-Valtorta, Ghinassi, and Tolsa-Toro. This survey paper is based on a talk at the Northeast Analysis Network Conference held in Syracuse, New York in September 2017.