Crowd-based Multi-Predicate Screening of Papers in Literature Reviews
Evgeny Krivosheev, Fabio Casati, Boualem Benatallah

TL;DR
This paper proposes an adaptive crowd-based approach for screening scientific papers in literature reviews, significantly improving efficiency and accuracy over non-adaptive methods through continuous statistical reassessment.
Contribution
It introduces a novel adaptive strategy for crowd-based paper screening that reduces costs and improves accuracy compared to existing non-adaptive approaches.
Findings
Adaptive strategy outperforms non-adaptive methods in cost and accuracy.
Crowdsourcing effective even for complex literature reviews.
Validated through multiple crowdsourcing experiments.
Abstract
Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are one of the most common and useful form of scientific research and publication. Tens of thousands of SLRs are published each year, and this rate is growing across all fields of science. Performing an accurate, complete and unbiased SLR is however a difficult and expensive endeavor. This is true in general for all phases of a literature review, and in particular for the paper screening phase, where authors lter a set of potentially in-scope papers based on a number of exclusion criteria. To address the problem, in recent years the research community has began to explore the use of the crowd to allow for a faster, accurate, cheaper and unbiased screening of papers. Initial results show that crowdsourcing can be effective, even for relatively complex reviews. In this paper we derive and analyze a set of strategies for crowd-based screening, and show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
