Lessons from HAWC PWNe observations: the diffusion constant is not a constant; Pulsars remain the likeliest sources of the anomalous positron fraction; Cosmic rays are trapped for long periods of time in pockets of inefficient diffusion
Stefano Profumo, Javier Reynoso-Cordova, Nicholas Kaaz, and Maya, Silverman

TL;DR
Recent HAWC observations suggest that diffusion within pulsar wind nebulae is inefficient, but spatially varying diffusion coefficients can reconcile pulsars as sources of the high-energy positron excess, implying cosmic rays are trapped longer in certain regions.
Contribution
This study demonstrates that assuming a spatially dependent diffusion coefficient resolves previous contradictions, allowing pulsars to account for the observed positron excess.
Findings
Diffusion coefficient varies spatially, not constant.
Pulsars can explain the high-energy positron flux.
Cosmic rays have long residence times in regions of inefficient diffusion.
Abstract
Recent TeV observations of nearby pulsars with the HAWC telescope have been interpreted as evidence that the diffusion of high-energy electrons and positrons within pulsar wind nebulae is highly inefficient compared to the rest of the interstellar medium. If the diffusion coefficient well outside the nebula is close to the value inferred for the region inside the nebula, high-energy electrons and positrons produced by the two observed pulsars could not contribute significantly to the local measured cosmic-ray flux. The HAWC Collaboration thus concluded that, under the assumption of isotropic and homogeneous diffusion, the two pulsars are ruled out as sources of the anomalous high-energy positron flux. Here, we argue that since the diffusion coefficient is likely not spatially homogeneous, the assumption leading to this conclusion is flawed. We solve the diffusion equation with a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
