RELICS: Strong Lensing analysis of the galaxy clusters Abell S295, Abell 697, MACS J0025.4-1222, and MACS J0159.8-0849
Nath\'alia Cibirka, Ana Acebron, Adi Zitrin, Dan Coe, Irene Agulli,, Felipe Andrade-Santos, Maru\v{s}a Brada\v{c}, Brenda Frye, Rachael C., Livermore, Guillaume Mahler, Brett Salmon, Keren Sharon, Michele Trenti,, Keiichi Umetsu, Roberto Avila, Larry Bradley, Daniela Carrasco

TL;DR
This paper presents strong lensing models for four galaxy clusters, revealing their mass distributions, merger states, and lensing strengths, and includes spectroscopic confirmation of a high-redshift galaxy behind one cluster.
Contribution
First published mass models for Abell S295 and MACS J0159.8-0849, with improved models for Abell 697 and MACS J0025.4-1222, and analysis of their lensing properties and merger scenarios.
Findings
Bimodal mass distribution in MACS J0025.4-1222 and Abell S295 supports merger scenarios.
Updated model for MACS J0025.4-1222 indicates smaller critical area.
Three clusters have lensing strengths comparable to Hubble Frontier Fields clusters.
Abstract
We present a strong-lensing analysis of four massive galaxy clusters imaged with the Hubble Space Telescope in the Reionization Lensing Cluster Survey. We use a Light-Traces-Mass technique to uncover sets of multiply images and constrain the mass distribution of the clusters. These mass models are the first published for Abell S295 and MACS J0159.8-0849, and are improvements over previous models for Abell 697 and MACS J0025.4-1222. Our analysis for MACS J0025.4-1222 and Abell S295 shows a bimodal mass distribution supporting the merger scenarios proposed for these clusters. The updated model for MACS J0025.4-1222 suggests a substantially smaller critical area than previously estimated. For MACS J0159.8-0849 and Abell 697 we find a single peak and relatively regular morphology, revealing fairly relaxed clusters. Despite being less prominent lenses, three of these clusters seem to have…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
