Projective geometry of Sasaki-Einstein structures and their compactification
A. Rod Gover, Katharina Neusser, Travis Willse

TL;DR
This paper explores the projective geometric interpretation of Sasaki-Einstein structures, providing new characterizations, compactification methods, and insights into their boundary structures, with applications to CR and Kähler-Einstein geometries.
Contribution
It introduces a projective geometric framework for Sasaki-Einstein structures, characterizes them via holonomy reductions, and describes their compactifications and boundary structures.
Findings
Sasaki-Einstein structures correspond to projective structures with specific unitary holonomy.
The boundary at infinity of certain Sasaki-Einstein structures is a Fefferman conformal manifold.
A new approach to contact projective geometry simplifies the understanding of symplectic holonomy reductions.
Abstract
We show that the standard definitions of Sasaki structures have elegant and simplifying interpretations in terms of projective differential geometry. For Sasaki-Einstein structures we use projective geometry to provide a resolution of such structures into geometrically less rigid components; the latter elemental components are separately, complex, orthogonal, and symplectic holonomy reductions of the canonical projective tractor/Cartan connection. This leads to a characterisation of Sasaki-Einstein structures as projective structures with certain unitary holonomy reductions. As an immediate application, this is used to describe the projective compactification of indefinite (suitably) complete non-compact Sasaki-Einstein structures and to prove that the boundary at infinity is a Fefferman conformal manifold that thus fibres over a nondegenerate CR manifold (of hypersurface type). We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
