TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian approach to network archaeology, revealing a phase transition in the ability to reconstruct network history, and demonstrates that meaningful inference is possible even in challenging scenarios.
Contribution
It presents a novel Bayesian formulation and efficient algorithms for network history reconstruction, identifying a phase transition in recoverability.
Findings
A phase transition exists in network history recoverability.
Nontrivial inference is feasible in many scenarios.
Algorithms perform well on artificial and real networks.
Abstract
Network growth processes can be understood as generative models of the structure and history of complex networks. This point of view naturally leads to the problem of network archaeology: reconstructing all the past states of a network from its structure---a difficult permutation inference problem. In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian formulation of network archaeology, with a generalization of preferential attachment as our generative mechanism. We develop a sequential Monte Carlo algorithm to evaluate the posterior averages of this model, as well as an efficient heuristic that uncovers a history well correlated with the true one, in polynomial time. We use these methods to identify and characterize a phase transition in the quality of the reconstructed history, when they are applied to artificial networks generated by the model itself. Despite the existence of a no-recovery phase,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
