Computational Power and the Social Impact of Artificial Intelligence

TL;DR

This paper explores how the evolution of computational hardware and architectures influences the development, capabilities, and societal impacts of artificial intelligence, emphasizing the nuanced relationship beyond mere computational power increases.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of how hardware characteristics shape AI research, deployment, and societal implications, filling a gap in existing social impact discussions.

Findings

Hardware influences AI training and inference speed

Computing architectures shape AI research methods

Hardware characteristics affect real-world AI applications

Abstract

Machine learning is a computational process. To that end, it is inextricably tied to computational power - the tangible material of chips and semiconductors that the algorithms of machine intelligence operate on. Most obviously, computational power and computing architectures shape the speed of training and inference in machine learning, and therefore influence the rate of progress in the technology. But, these relationships are more nuanced than that: hardware shapes the methods used by researchers and engineers in the design and development of machine learning models. Characteristics such as the power consumption of chips also define where and how machine learning can be used in the real world. Despite this, many analyses of the social impact of the current wave of progress in AI have not substantively brought the dimension of hardware into their accounts. While a common trope in both the popular press and scholarly literature is to highlight the massive increase in computational power that has enabled the recent breakthroughs in machine learning, the analysis frequently goes no further than this observation around magnitude. This paper aims to dig more deeply into the relationship between computational power and the development of machine learning. Specifically, it examines how changes in computing architectures, machine learning methodologies, and supply chains might influence the future of AI. In doing so, it seeks to trace a set of specific relationships between this underlying hardware layer and the broader social impacts and risks around AI.