On essentially 4-edge-connected cubic bricks
Nishad Kothari, Marcelo H. de Carvalho, Cl\'audio L. Lucchesi, Charles H. C. Little

TL;DR
This paper characterizes the structure of essentially 4-edge-connected cubic bricks, showing their edges can be partitioned into specific types and establishing conditions under which most edges are b-invariant.
Contribution
It proves that such bricks with adjacent quasi-b-invariant edges are either Petersen, Cubeplex, or have all other edges b-invariant, extending understanding of their edge structure.
Findings
Edges in these bricks can be partitioned into three sets: removable doubletons, b-invariant, and quasi-b-invariant edges.
If two adjacent quasi-b-invariant edges exist, the graph is either Petersen, Cubeplex, or all other edges are b-invariant.
Non-near-bipartite bricks have at least as many b-invariant edges as vertices.
Abstract
Lov\'asz (1987) proved that every matching covered graph may be uniquely decomposed into a list of bricks (nonbipartite) and braces (bipartite); we let denote the number of bricks. An edge is removable if is also matching covered; furthermore, is -invariant if , and is quasi--invariant if . (Each edge of the Petersen graph is quasi--invariant.) A brick is near-bipartite if it has a pair of edges so that is matching covered and bipartite; such a pair is a removable doubleton. (Each of and the triangular prism has three removable doubletons.) Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty (2002) proved a conjecture of Lov\'asz which states that every brick, distinct from , and the Petersen graph, has a -invariant edge. A cubic graph is essentially -edge-connected…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
