Muon content of extensive air showers: comparison of the energy spectra obtained by the Sydney University Giant Air-shower Recorder and by the Pierre Auger Observatory
J.A. Bellido, R.W. Clay, N.N. Kalmykov, I. S. Karpikov, G.I. Rubtsov,, S.V. Troitsky, J. Ulrichs

TL;DR
This study compares muon measurements from two major cosmic ray observatories to investigate muon content in air showers, revealing a significant muon excess over model predictions that grows with energy.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical comparison of muon content in air showers between the SUGAR and Pierre Auger Observatory data, highlighting discrepancies with hadronic interaction models.
Findings
Empirical muon counts exceed model predictions by factors of 1.67 (protons) and 1.28 (iron) at 10^{17} eV.
Muon excess increases with primary energy, reaching a factor of 1.2 at 10^{18.5} eV.
Comparison constrains hadronic interaction models and improves understanding of cosmic ray composition.
Abstract
The Sydney University Giant Air-shower Recorder (SUGAR) measured the energy spectrum of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays reconstructed from muon-detector readings, while the Pierre Auger Observatory, looking at the same Southern sky, uses the calorimetric fluorescence method for the same purpose. Comparison of their two spectra allows us to reconstruct the empirical dependence of the number of muons in the shower on the primary energy for energies between and eV. We compare this dependence with the predictions of hadronic interaction models \mbox{QGSJET-II-04} and \mbox{EPOS-LHC}. The empirically determined number of muons with energies above 0.75 GeV exceeds the simulated one by the factors 1.67 and 1.28 for eV proton and iron primaries, respectively. The muon excess grows moderately with the primary energy, increasing by an additional factor of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
