Pricing Credit Default Swap Subject to Counterparty Risk and Collateralization
Alan White

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new model for valuing credit default swaps considering multiple credit risks and collateralization, highlighting the impact of default dependency and the limitations of collateralization in eliminating counterparty risk.
Contribution
It presents a novel valuation model for CDS that accounts for multiple credit risks and demonstrates that full collateralization does not fully eliminate counterparty risk.
Findings
Default dependency significantly affects asset pricing.
Fully collateralized CDSs are not equivalent to risk-free ones.
Correlated default risk is a pervasive market threat.
Abstract
This article presents a new model for valuing a credit default swap (CDS) contract that is affected by multiple credit risks of the buyer, seller and reference entity. We show that default dependency has a significant impact on asset pricing. In fact, correlated default risk is one of the most pervasive threats in financial markets. We also show that a fully collateralized CDS is not equivalent to a risk-free one. In other words, full collateralization cannot eliminate counterparty risk completely in the CDS market.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
