The correct formulation of Gleason's theorem in quaternionic Hilbert spaces
Valter Moretti (Trento U., TIFPA-INFN), Marco Oppio (Regensburg)

TL;DR
This paper corrects and extends Gleason's theorem for quaternionic Hilbert spaces, clarifying the role of the trace and ensuring the theorem's validity across real, complex, and quaternionic quantum theories.
Contribution
It provides a mathematically correct formulation of Gleason's theorem in quaternionic Hilbert spaces, addressing previous inaccuracies related to the trace concept.
Findings
Only the real part of the trace is used in quaternionic quantum theories.
The corrected theorem applies uniformly to real, complex, and quaternionic Hilbert spaces.
The paper develops the theory of trace-class operators in quaternionic spaces.
Abstract
From the viewpoint of the theory of orthomodular lattices of elementary propositions, Quantum Theories can be formulated in real, complex or quaternionic Hilbert spaces as established in Sol\'er's theorem. The said lattice eventually coincides with the lattice of all orthogonal projectors on a separable Hilbert space over R, C, or over the algebra of quaternions H. Quantum states are -additive probability measures on that non-Boolean lattice. Gleason's theorem proves that, if the Hilbert space is separable with dimension >2 and the Hilbert space is either real or complex, then states are one-to-one with standard density matrices (self-adjoint, positive, unit-trace, trace-class operators). The extension of this result to quaternionic Hilbert spaces was obtained by Varadarajan in 1968. Unfortunately, even if the hard part of the proof is correct, the formulation of this extension…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
