The Spitzer-IRAC/MIPS Extragalactic Survey (SIMES): II enhanced nuclear accretion rate in galaxy groups at z$\sim$0.2
I. Baronchelli, G. Rodighiero, H. I. Teplitz, C. M. Scarlata, A., Franceschini, S. Berta, L. Barrufet, M. Vaccari, M. Bonato, L. Ciesla, A., Zanella, R. Carraro, C. Mancini, A. Puglisi, M. Malkan, S. Mei, L. Marchetti,, J. Colbert, C. Sedgwick, S. Serjeant, C. Pearson

TL;DR
This study investigates how nuclear accretion rates and AGN activity in star-forming galaxies at z~0.2 vary with galaxy group mass, revealing enhanced black hole growth in more massive groups using multi-wavelength data and SED fitting.
Contribution
It introduces a new multi-wavelength dataset and applies advanced SED fitting to quantify AGN contributions, revealing the dependence of black hole accretion on group mass at intermediate redshift.
Findings
Black hole accretion rate scales with group mass as M^{1.21}
BHAR/SFR ratio increases with group mass
No significant change in AGN fraction across group masses
Abstract
For a sample of star forming galaxies in the redshift interval 0.15z0.3, we study how both the relative strength of the AGN infra-red emission, compared to that due to the star formation (SF), and the numerical fraction of AGNs, change as a function of the total stellar mass of the hosting galaxy group (M), between and M. Using a multi-component SED fitting analysis, we separate the contribution of stars, AGN torus and star formation to the total emission at different wavelengths. This technique is applied to a new multi-wavelength data-set in the SIMES field (23 not redundant photometric bands), spanning the wavelength range from the UV (GALEX) to the far-IR (Herschel) and including crucial AKARI and WISE mid-IR observations (4.5 \mu m24 \mu m), where the BH thermal emission is stronger. This new photometric…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
