The complexity of comparing multiply-labelled trees by extending phylogenetic-tree metrics
Manuel Lafond, Nadia El-Mabrouk, Katharina T. Huber, Vincent, Moulton

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of extending phylogenetic tree metrics to multilabeled trees (MUL-trees), revealing NP-completeness results and fixed-parameter tractability for specific cases, with implications for phylogenetics and related problems.
Contribution
It establishes the NP-completeness of extending key phylogenetic metrics to MUL-trees and explores fixed-parameter tractability, advancing understanding of computational challenges in phylogenetics.
Findings
Computing metric extension on MUL-trees is NP-complete for path-difference and Robinson Foulds distances.
Extension of Robinson Foulds distance is fixed parameter tractable.
Maximum agreement subtree distance on multiple MUL-trees is NP-complete, but fixed-parameter tractable in certain cases.
Abstract
A multilabeled tree (or MUL-tree) is a rooted tree in which every leaf is labelled by an element from some set, but in which more than one leaf may be labelled by the same element of that set. In phylogenetics, such trees are used in biogeographical studies, to study the evolution of gene families, and also within approaches to construct phylogenetic networks. A multilabelled tree in which no leaf-labels are repeated is called a phylogenetic tree, and one in which every label is the same is also known as a tree-shape. In this paper, we consider the complexity of computing metrics on MUL-trees that are obtained by extending metrics on phylogenetic trees. In particular, by restricting our attention to tree shapes, we show that computing the metric extension on MUL-trees is NP complete for two well-known metrics on phylogenetic trees, namely, the path-difference and Robinson Foulds…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
