Optimal Bounds for Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transformations
Michael Burr, Shuhong Gao, and Fiona Knoll

TL;DR
This paper establishes the exact asymptotic bounds on the dimension needed for Johnson-Lindenstrauss projections to preserve Euclidean distances, clarifying when such low-dimensional embeddings are possible or impossible.
Contribution
It provides a precise threshold for the dimension of Johnson-Lindenstrauss transformations, delineating the boundary between feasible and infeasible projections.
Findings
Identifies the asymptotic dimension threshold for distance-preserving projections.
Shows the non-existence of such projections below the threshold.
Confirms the existence of projections above the threshold.
Abstract
In 1984, Johnson and Lindenstrauss proved that any finite set of data in a high-dimensional space can be projected to a lower-dimensional space while preserving the pairwise Euclidean distance between points up to a bounded relative error. If the desired dimension of the image is too small, however, Kane, Meka, and Nelson (2011) and Jayram and Woodruff (2013) independently proved that such a projection does not exist. In this paper, we provide a precise asymptotic threshold for the dimension of the image, above which, there exists a projection preserving the Euclidean distance, but, below which, there does not exist such a projection.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
