A complementary proof of Baker's theorem of completely invariant components for transcendental entire functions
Patricia Dom\'inguez, Guillermo Sienra

TL;DR
This paper provides an alternative proof of Baker's theorem on the uniqueness of completely invariant Fatou components for transcendental entire functions, addressing a missing case in the original proof.
Contribution
It offers a new proof of Baker's theorem, filling a gap in the original argument and enhancing understanding of Fatou set invariance.
Findings
Confirmed at most one completely invariant Fatou component exists
Provided an alternative proof addressing the missing case
Strengthened the theoretical foundation of transcendental dynamics
Abstract
Baker proved that for transcendental entire functions there is at most one completely invariant component of the Fatou set. It was observed by Julien Duval that there is a missing case in Baker's proof. In this article we follow Baker's ideas and give some alternative arguments to establish the result.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeromorphic and Entire Functions · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Mathematics and Applications
