How Smart Are `Water Smart Landscapes'?
Christa Brelsford, Joshua K. Abbott

TL;DR
This study evaluates the long-term effectiveness of Nevada's Water Smart Landscapes program, showing significant water savings and cost-effectiveness over twelve years using detailed household water usage data.
Contribution
It provides the first extensive empirical analysis of a large-scale, long-term turf removal program using panel data and difference-in-differences methodology.
Findings
Households reduced water use by 18% after program participation.
Water savings did not decline as landscapes aged.
Cost per thousand gallons saved is approximately $1.62.
Abstract
Understanding the effectiveness of alternative approaches to water conservation is crucially important for ensuring the security and reliability of water services for urban residents. We analyze data from one of the longest-running "cash for grass" policies - the Southern Nevada Water Authority's Water Smart Landscapes program, where homeowners are paid to replace grass with xeric landscaping. We use a twelve year long panel dataset of monthly water consumption records for 300,000 households in Las Vegas, Nevada. Utilizing a panel difference-in-differences approach, we estimate the average water savings per square meter of turf removed. We find that participation in this program reduced the average treated household's consumption by 18 percent. We find no evidence that water savings degrade as the landscape ages, or that water savings per unit area are influenced by the value of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
