
TL;DR
This paper explores the connection between Coxeter groups and quiver representations, highlighting classical and recent developments, including a new elementary proof of a bijection in the general case.
Contribution
It provides an elementary proof of the bijection between torsion free classes with finitely many indecomposables and c-sortable elements in Weyl groups, extending previous Dynkin type results.
Findings
Torsion free classes correspond to c-sortable elements
Classical topics include roots and reflection functors
New proof applies to general quivers, not just Dynkin types
Abstract
In this expository note, I showcase the relevance of Coxeter groups to quiver representations. I discuss (1) real and imaginary roots, (2) reflection functors, and (3) torsion free classes and c-sortable elements. The first two topics are classical, while the third is a more recent development. I show that torsion free classes in rep Q containing finitely many indecomposables correspond bijectively to c-sortable elements in the corresponding Weyl group. This was first established in Dynkin type by Ingalls and Thomas; it was shown in general by Amiot, Iyama, Reiten, and Todorov. The proof in this note is elementary, essentially following the argument of Ingalls and Thomas, but without the assumption that Q is Dynkin.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
