Turbulence in the TW Hya Disk

TL;DR

This study constrains turbulence in the TW Hya disk using ALMA and SMA observations, finding it to be lower than previous estimates, which impacts models of planet formation.

Contribution

It provides a self-consistent analysis of multiple CO line observations to set a more stringent upper limit on disk turbulence, addressing discrepancies in prior measurements.

Findings

Turbulence upper limit is less than 0.08c_s.

Discrepancies with previous measurements are due to assumptions about temperature and CO distribution.

Turbulence is significantly lower than earlier tentative detections.

Abstract

Turbulence is a fundamental parameter in models of grain growth during the early stages of planet formation. As such, observational constraints on its magnitude are crucial. Here we self-consistently analyze ALMA CO(2-1), SMA CO(3-2), and SMA CO(6-5) observations of the disk around TW Hya and find an upper limit on the turbulent broadening of $<$0.08c$_s$ ($\alpha<$0.007 for $\alpha$ defined only within 2-3 pressure scale heights above the midplane), lower than the tentative detection previously found from an analysis of the CO(2-1) data. We examine in detail the challenges of image plane fitting vs directly fitting the visibilities, while also considering the role of the vertical temperature gradient, systematic uncertainty in the amplitude calibration, and assumptions about the CO abundance, as potential sources of the discrepancy in the turbulence measurements. These tests result in variations of the turbulence limit between $<$0.04c$_s$ and $<$0.13c$_s$, consistently lower than the 0.2-0.4c$_s$ found previously. Having ruled out numerous factors, we restrict the source of the discrepancy to our assumed coupling between temperature and density through hydrostatic equilibrium in the presence of a vertical temperature gradient and/or the confinement of CO to a thin molecular layer above the midplane, although further work is needed to quantify the influence of these prescriptions. Assumptions about hydrostatic equilibrium and the CO distribution are physically motivated, and may have a small influence on measuring the kinematics of the gas, but they become important when constraining small effects such as the strength of the turbulence within a protoplanetary disk.