Accurately predicting the escape fraction of ionizing photons using restframe ultraviolet absorption lines
J. Chisholm, S. Gazagnes, D. Schaerer, A. Verhamme, J. R. Rigby, M., Bayliss, K. Sharon, M. Gladders, and H. Dahle

TL;DR
This study develops and validates indirect methods to accurately predict the escape fraction of ionizing photons from galaxies, crucial for understanding cosmic reionization, by analyzing UV absorption lines and other indicators in low-redshift galaxies.
Contribution
The paper introduces new indirect techniques, including UV absorption lines, Lyα escape fraction, and [O III]/[O II] ratios, to estimate ionizing photon escape fractions in galaxies.
Findings
Predicted escape fractions closely match observed values within 1.4σ.
Dust attenuation significantly reduces ionizing photon escape.
Many high-redshift galaxies likely emit more ionizing photons than low-redshift counterparts.
Abstract
The fraction of ionizing photons that escape high-redshift galaxies sensitively determines whether galaxies reionized the early universe. However, this escape fraction cannot be measured from high-redshift galaxies because the opacity of the intergalactic medium is large at high redshifts. Without methods to indirectly measure the escape fraction of high-redshift galaxies, it is unlikely that we will know what reionized the universe. Here, we analyze the far-ultraviolet (UV) H I (Lyman series) and low-ionization metal absorption lines of nine low-redshift, confirmed Lyman continuum emitting galaxies. We use the H I covering fractions, column densities, and dust attenuations measured in a companion paper to predict the escape fraction of ionizing photons. We find good agreement between the predicted and observed Lyman continuum escape fractions (within ) using both the H I and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
