ASASSN-16dt and ASASSN-16hg: Promising Candidates for a Period Bouncer
Mariko Kimura, Keisuke Isogai, Taichi Kato, Kenta Taguchi, Yasuyuki, Wakamatsu, Franz-Josef Hambsch, Berto Monard, Gordon Myers, Shawn Dvorak,, Peter Starr, Stephen M. Brincat, Enrique de Miguel, Joseph Ulowetz, Hiroshi, Itoh, Geoff Stone, Daisaku Nogami

TL;DR
This study analyzes optical light curves of two WZ Sge-type dwarf novae, identifying features indicative of very low mass ratios and suggesting they are promising candidates for period bouncers, which are post-period minimum cataclysmic variables.
Contribution
It provides detailed observational evidence linking light curve features to low mass ratios and proposes ASASSN-16dt and possibly ASASSN-16hg as strong period bouncer candidates.
Findings
ASASSN-16dt has a mass ratio of 0.036(2).
Light curve dips are caused by slow evolution of tidal instability.
Properties match those expected for period bouncers.
Abstract
We present optical photometry of superoutbursts in 2016 of two WZ Sge-type dwarf novae (DNe), ASASSN-16dt and ASASSN-16hg. Their light curves showed a dip in brightness between the first plateau stage with no ordinary superhumps (or early superhumps) and the second plateau stage with ordinary superhumps. We find that the dip is produced by slow evolution of the 3:1 resonance tidal instability and that it would be likely observed in low mass-ratio objects. The estimated mass ratio () from the period of developing (stage A) superhumps (0.06420(3) d) was 0.036(2) in ASASSN-16dt. Additionally, its superoutburst has many properties similar to those in other low- WZ Sge-type DNe: long-lasting stage A superhumps, small superhump amplitudes, long delay of ordinary superhump appearance, and slow decline rate in the plateau stage with superhumps. The very small mass ratio…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
