Applicability and interpretation of the deterministic weighted cepstral distance
Oliver Lauwers, Bart De Moor

TL;DR
This paper extends the weighted cepstral distance to linear time-invariant models, providing a data-driven method to analyze system stability and phase characteristics for applications like time series clustering.
Contribution
It introduces an extension of the weighted cepstral distance for LTI models and links it to system stability and phase, enabling analysis without system identification.
Findings
The extended distance can be interpreted via poles and zeros.
A method for assessing stability and phase type from input/output data.
Connection established between the distance and a model norm.
Abstract
Quantifying similarity between data objects is an important part of modern data science. Deciding what similarity measure to use is very application dependent. In this paper, we combine insights from systems theory and machine learning, and investigate the weighted cepstral distance, which was previously defined for signals coming from ARMA models. We provide an extension of this distance to invertible deterministic linear time invariant single input single output models, and assess its applicability. We show that it can always be interpreted in terms of the poles and zeros of the underlying model, and that, in the case of stable, minimum-phase, or unstable, maximum-phase models, a geometrical interpretation in terms of subspace angles can be given. We then devise a method to assess stability and phase-type of the generating models, using only input/output signal information. In this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDysphagia Assessment and Management
