Assessing a GTA professional development program
Emily Alicea-Mu\~noz, Joan Espar Masip, Carol Subi\~no Sullivan,, Michael F. Schatz

TL;DR
This paper evaluates a comprehensive GTA professional development program at Georgia Tech, showing it enhances teaching preparedness, promotes learner-centered strategies, and improves student evaluation scores.
Contribution
It introduces an integrated assessment approach for GTA training programs, demonstrating their positive impact on teaching effectiveness.
Findings
GTAs find the program's activities useful
Participants feel more prepared for teaching
Higher teaching evaluation scores for program participants
Abstract
For the last four years, the School of Physics at Georgia Tech have been preparing new Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) through a program that integrates pedagogy, physics content, and professional development strategies. Here we discuss various assessments we have used to evaluate the program, among them surveys, GTA self-reporting, and end-of-semester student evaluations. Our results indicate that GTAs who participate in the program find its practical activities useful, feel better prepared for teaching, make use of learner-centered teaching strategies, and receive higher scores in teaching evaluations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
