An H$\alpha$ Imaging Survey of the Low-surface-brightness Galaxies Selected from the Fall Sky Region of the 40$\%$ ALFALFA \ion{H}{1} Survey
Fengjie Lei, Hong Wu, Wei Du, Yinan Zhu, Man I Lam, Zhimin Zhou, Min, He, Junjie Jin, Tianwen Cao, Pinsong Zhao, Fan Yang, Chaojian Wu, Hongbin Li,, Juanjuan Ren

TL;DR
This study measures Hα flux and star formation rates in low-surface-brightness galaxies from the ALFALFA survey, revealing their low star formation efficiency and deviation from the Kennicutt-Schmidt law, suggesting they are stable, slowly evolving systems.
Contribution
First comprehensive Hα imaging survey of LSBGs from the ALFALFA survey, providing new insights into their star formation properties and efficiency.
Findings
LSBGs have low SFRs (<1 M_sun/yr) despite being H I-rich.
LSBGs deviate from the Kennicutt-Schmidt law, indicating low star formation efficiency.
LSBGs are stable systems with infrequent major interactions or mergers.
Abstract
We present the observed H flux and derived star formation rates (SFRs) for a fall sample of lowsurfacebrightness galaxies (LSBGs). The sample is selected from the fall sky region of the 40 ALFALFA {\ion{H}{1}} survey SDSS DR7 photometric data, and all the images were obtained using the 2.16 m telescope, operated by the National Astronomy Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences. A total of 111 LSBGs were observed and flux was measured in 92 of them. Though almost all the LSBGs in our sample are {\ion{H}{1}}rich, their SFRs derived from the extinction and filtertransmissioncorrected flux, are less than 1. LSBGs and star forming galaxies have similar {\ion{H}{1}} surface densities, but LSBGs have much lower SFRs and SFR surface densities than starforming galaxies. Our results show that LSBGs deviate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
