On the accuracy of simulating mixing by random-walk particle-based mass-transfer algorithms
Michael J. Schmidt, Stephen D. Pankavich, David A. Benson

TL;DR
This paper evaluates various particle-based mass transfer algorithms for simulating mixing, highlighting their accuracy, computational complexity, and practical applicability for different particle counts.
Contribution
It compares implicit, explicit, and mixed methods for particle mass transfer, analyzing their accuracy and computational efficiency in simulating mixing processes.
Findings
All algorithms are accurate to order Δt.
Implicit methods require O(N^3) calculations, explicit methods require O(N^2).
Explicit methods are more practical for simulations with more than 5,000 particles.
Abstract
Several algorithms have been used for mass transfer between particles undergoing advective and macro-dispersive random walks. The mass transfer between particles is required for general reactions on, and among, particles. The mass transfer is shown to be diffusive, and may be simulated using implicit, explicit, or mixed methods. All algorithms investigated are accurate to . For particles, the implicit and semi-implicit methods require inverse matrix solutions and calculations. The explicit methods use forward matrix solves and require only calculations. Practically, this means that naive implementations with more than about 5,000 particles run more reliably using explicit methods
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
