The SLUGGS Survey: A comparison of total-mass profiles of early-type galaxies from observations and cosmological simulations, to $\sim$4 effective radii
Sabine Bellstedt, Duncan A. Forbes, Aaron J. Romanowsky, Rhea-Silvia, Remus, Adam R. H. Stevens, Jean P. Brodie, Adriano Poci, Richard McDermid,, Adebusola Alabi, Leonie Chevalier, Caitlin Adams, Anna Ferr\'e-Mateu, Asher, Wasserman, Viraj Pandya

TL;DR
This study measures the total-mass density profiles of early-type galaxies using dynamical models and compares them with cosmological simulations, revealing a near-universal slope slightly steeper than isothermal and highlighting differences with simulated galaxy profiles.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive comparison of observed total-mass profiles with cosmological simulations across a broad stellar mass range, identifying discrepancies and the role of merger history.
Findings
Total-mass density slopes are consistent with previous inner-region measurements.
Observed slopes are slightly steeper than those in simulations.
A significant anticorrelation exists between slope and ex situ stellar mass fraction in massive galaxies.
Abstract
We apply the Jeans Anisotropic MGE (JAM) dynamical modelling method to SAGES Legacy Unifying Globulars and GalaxieS (SLUGGS) survey data of early-type galaxies in the stellar mass range that cover a large radial range of effective radii. We combine SLUGGS and ATLAS datasets to model the total-mass profiles of a sample of 21 fast-rotator galaxies, utilising a hyperparameter method to combine the two independent datasets. The total-mass density profile slope values derived for these galaxies are consistent with those measured in the inner regions of galaxies by other studies. Furthermore, the total-mass density slopes () appear to be universal over this broad stellar mass range, with an average value of , i.e. slightly steeper than isothermal. We compare our results to model…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
