A complete FFT-based decomposition formalism for the redshift-space bispectrum
Naonori S. Sugiyama, Shun Saito, Florian Beutler, and Hee-Jong Seo

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new FFT-based formalism for decomposing the redshift-space bispectrum, enabling efficient measurement and separation of anisotropic signals caused by redshift-space distortions and the Alcock-Paczyński effect.
Contribution
It presents a novel tri-polar spherical harmonic decomposition formalism that preserves key cosmological symmetries and simplifies the analysis of the anisotropic bispectrum in redshift space.
Findings
First detection of the anisotropic bispectrum in the L=2 mode with 14σ significance.
Demonstrated the formalism on BOSS DR12 data, showing practical applicability.
Reduced computational complexity using FFTs and provided a method to correct survey geometry effects.
Abstract
To fully extract cosmological information from nonlinear galaxy distribution in redshift space, it is essential to include higher-order statistics beyond the two-point correlation function. In this paper, we propose a new decomposition formalism for computing the anisotropic bispectrum in redshift space and for measuring it from galaxy samples. Our formalism uses tri-polar spherical harmonic decomposition with zero total angular momentum to compress the 3D modes distribution in the redshift-space bispectrum. This approach preserves three fundamental properties of the Universe: statistical homogeneity, isotropy, and parity-symmetry, allowing us to efficiently separate the anisotropic signal induced by redshift-space distortions (RSDs) and the Alcock-Paczy\'{n}ski (AP) effect from the isotropic bispectrum. The relevant expansion coefficients in terms of the anisotropic signal are reduced…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
