The Gaia-ESO Survey: kinematical and dynamical study of four young open clusters
L. Bravi, E. Zari, G. G. Sacco, S. Randich, R. D. Jeffries, R. J., Jackson, E. Franciosini, E. Moraux, J. L\'opez-Santiago, E. Pancino, L., Spina, N. Wright, F. M. Jim\'enez-Esteban, A. Klutsch, V. Roccatagliata, G., Gilmore, A. Bragaglia, E. Flaccomio, P. Francois

TL;DR
This study analyzes the kinematical and dynamical properties of four young open clusters using Gaia-ESO Survey data and Gaia astrometry to understand their formation and dispersal, finding most are supervirial and likely dispersing.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of radial velocity and astrometric dispersions in young clusters, highlighting their dynamical states and supporting the residual gas expulsion model.
Findings
Three clusters are supervirial, indicating dispersal.
Spectroscopic velocity dispersions are larger than astrometric ones.
Clusters are likely in the process of dispersing.
Abstract
Context. The origin and dynamical evolution of star clusters is an important topic in stellar astrophysics. Several models have been proposed to understand the formation of bound and unbound clusters and their evolution, and these can be tested by examining the kinematical and dynamical properties of clusters over a wide range of ages and masses. Aims. We use the Gaia-ESO Survey products to study four open clusters (IC 2602, IC 2391, IC 4665, and NGC 2547) that lie in the age range between 20 and 50 Myr. Methods. We employ the gravity index and the equivalent width of the lithium line at 6708 , together with effective temperature , and the metallicity of the stars in order to discard observed contaminant stars. Then, we derive the cluster radial velocity dispersions , the total cluster mass , and the half mass radius . Using…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
