Cosmological constraints from the redshift dependence of the Alcock-Paczynski effect: Dynamical dark energy
Xiao-Dong Li, Cristiano G. Sabiu, Changbom Park, Yuting Wang, Gong-bo, Zhao, Hyunbae Park, Arman Shafieloo, Juhan Kim, Sungwook E. Hong

TL;DR
This study uses the redshift evolution of anisotropic galaxy clustering from SDSS-III BOSS data to constrain dark energy parameters, improving methodology and combining multiple cosmological probes for tighter constraints.
Contribution
It introduces an improved analysis method for anisotropic clustering, enabling efficient exploration of high-dimensional cosmological parameter spaces, applied to dark energy parametrization.
Findings
Constraints on cosmological parameters consistent with previous results.
Reduced uncertainties in dark energy parameters by 30-40%.
Enhanced dark energy figure of merit by a factor of 2.
Abstract
We perform an anisotropic clustering analysis of 1,133,326 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-III) Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) Data Release (DR) 12 covering the redshift range . The geometrical distortions of the galaxy positions, caused by incorrect cosmological model assumptions, are captured in the anisotropic two-point correlation function on scales 6 -- 40 . The redshift evolution of this anisotropic clustering is used to place constraints on the cosmological parameters. We improve the methodology of Li et al. 2016, to enable efficient exploration of high dimensional cosmological parameter spaces, and apply it to the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder parametrization of dark energy, . In combination with the CMB, BAO, SNIa and from Cepheid data, we obtain $\Omega_m = 0.301 \pm 0.008,\ w_0 = -1.042 \pm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
