Conforming, non-conforming and non-matching discretization couplings in discrete fracture network simulations
Alessio Fumagalli, Eirik Keilegavlen, Stefano Scial\`o

TL;DR
This paper reviews various numerical discretization methods for simulating fluid flow in complex discrete fracture networks, providing guidance on balancing accuracy and computational cost.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive comparison of conforming and non-conforming discretization approaches for fracture network simulations, including practical guidelines.
Findings
Different methods exhibit trade-offs between accuracy and computational efficiency.
Non-matching discretizations can effectively handle complex fracture intersections.
Guidelines help choose appropriate methods based on network complexity and resource constraints.
Abstract
Simulations of fluid flow in naturally fractured rocks have implications for several subsurface applications, including energy storage and extraction, and waste storage. We are interested in flow in discrete fracture networks, which explicitly represent flow in fracture surfaces, but ignore the impact of the surrounding host rock. Fracture networks, generated from observations or stochastic simulations, will contain intersections of arbitrary length, and intersection lines can further cross, forming a highly complex geometry. As the flow exchange between fractures, thus in the network, takes place in these intersections, an adequate representation of the geometry is critical for simulation accuracy. In practice, the intersection dynamics must be handled by a combination of the simulation grid, which may or may not resolve the intersection lines, and the numerical methods applied on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
