Testing a Goodwin model with general capital accumulation rate
Matheus R. Grasselli, Aditya Maheshwari

TL;DR
This paper tests a modified Goodwin model with a general capital accumulation rate, showing improved empirical fit and suggesting its usefulness as a baseline for more complex endogenous growth cycle models.
Contribution
It introduces a modified Goodwin model with a flexible capital accumulation rate and demonstrates improved empirical performance over previous implementations.
Findings
Near perfect agreement with empirical equilibrium employment rates
Significantly better estimates of equilibrium wage shares
Model serves as a useful starting point for advanced growth cycle models
Abstract
We perform econometric tests on a modified Goodwin model where the capital accumulation rate is constant but not necessarily equal to one as in the original model (Goodwin, 1967). In addition to this modification, we find that addressing the methodological and reporting issues in Harvie (2000) leads to remarkably better results, with near perfect agreement between the estimates of equilibrium employment rates and the corresponding empirical averages, as well as significantly improved estimates of equilibrium wage shares. Despite its simplicity and obvious limitations, the performance of the modified Goodwin model implied by our results show that it can be used as a starting point for more sophisticated models for endogenous growth cycles.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic theories and models · Economic Theory and Policy · Economic Growth and Productivity
