A strong limit on the very-high-energy emission from GRB 150323A

TL;DR

This study reports no detection of very-high-energy gamma-ray emission from GRB 150323A with VERITAS, setting upper limits that suggest the burst's high-energy afterglow was intrinsically weak or had a spectral cutoff.

Contribution

First VHE upper limit on GRB 150323A, constraining its high-energy emission properties and environment, with implications for GRB progenitor models.

Findings

No significant VHE gamma-ray signal detected.

Limits imply a weak or cutoff high-energy spectrum.

Constraints on the surrounding medium density.

Abstract

On 2015 March 23, VERITAS responded to a $Swift$-BAT detection of a gamma-ray burst, with observations beginning 270 seconds after the onset of BAT emission, and only 135 seconds after the main BAT emission peak. No statistically significant signal is detected above 140 GeV. The VERITAS upper limit on the fluence in a 40 minute integration corresponds to about 1% of the prompt fluence. Our limit is particularly significant since the very-high-energy (VHE) observation started only $\sim$2 minutes after the prompt emission peaked, and $Fermi$-LAT observations of numerous other bursts have revealed that the high-energy emission is typically delayed relative to the prompt radiation and lasts significantly longer. Also, the proximity of GRB~150323A ($z=0.593$) limits the attenuation by the extragalactic background light to $\sim 50$ % at 100-200 GeV. We conclude that GRB 150323A had an intrinsically very weak high-energy afterglow, or that the GeV spectrum had a turnover below $\sim100$ GeV. If the GRB exploded into the stellar wind of a massive progenitor, the VHE non-detection constrains the wind density parameter to be $A\gtrsim 3\times 10^{11}$ g cm$^{-1}$, consistent with a standard Wolf-Rayet progenitor. Alternatively, the VHE emission from the blast wave would be weak in a very tenuous medium such as the ISM, which therefore cannot be ruled out as the environment of GRB 150323A.