Observation of correlated excitations in bimolecular collisions
Zhi Gao, Tijs Karman, Sjoerd N. Vogels, Matthieu Besemer, Ad van der, Avoird, Gerrit C. Groenenboom, and Sebastiaan Y. T. van de Meerakker

TL;DR
This study measures and analyzes quantum state-resolved bimolecular collision cross sections between nitric oxide radicals and oxygen molecules, revealing new insights into their correlated excitations and challenging existing collision laws.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed experimental measurements of correlated product excitations in bimolecular collisions and compares them with quantum calculations, advancing understanding of molecular scattering.
Findings
Correlated cross sections agree well with quantum scattering calculations.
Energy-gap law does not generally apply to bimolecular excitation processes.
Revealed a propensity rule for product angular momentum correlations.
Abstract
Whereas collisions between atoms and molecules are largely understood, collisions between two molecules have proven much harder to study. In both experiment and theory, our ability to determine quantum state-resolved bimolecular cross sections lags behind their atom-molecule counterparts by decades. For many bimolecular systems, even rules of thumb -- much less intuitive understanding -- of scattering cross sections are lacking. Here, we report the measurement of state-to-state differential cross sections on the collision of state-selected and velocity-controlled nitric oxide (NO) radicals and oxygen (O2) molecules. Using velocity map imaging of the scattered NO radicals, the full product-pair correlations of rotational excitation that occurs in both collision partners from individual encounters are revealed. The correlated cross sections show surprisingly good agreement with quantum…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
