Beyond black-boxes in Bayesian inverse problems and model validation: applications in solid mechanics of elastography
Lukas Bruder, Phaedon-Stelios Koutsourelakis

TL;DR
This paper introduces a physically-informed probabilistic framework for Bayesian inverse problems in solid mechanics, explicitly modeling model discrepancies to improve uncertainty quantification and validation in elastography.
Contribution
It proposes an undirected probabilistic model that incorporates governing equations directly, moving beyond black-box approaches, and develops a scalable inference method for complex high-dimensional problems.
Findings
Effective in synthetic elastography problems with and without model error
Demonstrates improved model discrepancy quantification
Shows scalability of the inference approach
Abstract
The present paper is motivated by one of the most fundamental challenges in inverse problems, that of quantifying model discrepancies and errors. While significant strides have been made in calibrating model parameters, the overwhelming majority of pertinent methods is based on the assumption of a perfect model. Motivated by problems in solid mechanics which, as all problems in continuum thermodynamics, are described by conservation laws and phenomenological constitutive closures, we argue that in order to quantify model uncertainty in a physically meaningful manner, one should break open the black-box forward model. In particular we propose formulating an undirected probabilistic model that explicitly accounts for the governing equations and their validity. This recasts the solution of both forward and inverse problems as probabilistic inference tasks where the problem's state…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
