Evaluation of weighted Fibonacci sums of a certain type
Kunle Adegoke

TL;DR
This paper derives a formula for evaluating weighted sums involving generalized Fibonacci numbers, providing explicit examples and expanding the understanding of Fibonacci sum evaluations.
Contribution
It introduces a new formula for weighted generalized Fibonacci sums of a specific type, with several explicit evaluations as examples.
Findings
Derived a general formula for weighted Fibonacci sums
Provided explicit evaluations for specific cases
Enhanced methods for Fibonacci sum calculations
Abstract
We derive a formula for the evaluation of weighted generalized Fibonacci sums of the type . Several explicit evaluations are presented as examples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications · Advanced Mathematical Identities · Analytic Number Theory Research
Evaluation of weighted Fibonacci sums of a certain type††thanks: AMS Classification: 11B37, 11B39, 65B10
Kunle Adegoke [email protected] Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Obafemi Awolowo University, 220005 Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Abstract
We derive a formula for the evaluation of weighted generalized Fibonacci sums of the type . Several explicit evaluations are presented as examples.
1 Introduction
The generalized Fibonacci numbers , , are defined through the second order recurrence relation , with arbitrary seeds and . In particular, when and , we have the Fibonacci numbers, denoted , and when and , we have the Lucas numbers, . Extension to negative index is provided through , Vajda [12], Formula (9).
In this paper we will derive a formula (Theorem 3.2) for the evaluation of weighted generalized Fibonacci sums of the type
[TABLE]
where is a real or complex parameter and , and are nonnegative integers. For brevity, will be denoted and will often be denoted simply by . Similarly, we will write for . The evaluation of has received some attention in the literature, see for example references [10, 9, 2, 5, 11].
Since in (1.1) is to give , we shall adopt the convention that for all , including .
For evaluating sums with we shall use
[TABLE]
In particular
[TABLE]
Following Gauthier [4], we introduce the differential operator
[TABLE]
and note the following properties:
. 2. 2.
, for complex numbers and . 3. 3.
for times differentiable functions and . 4. 4.
If , where the coefficients are real or complex numbers and is an integer, then, , where is the usual Kronecker delta. 5. 5.
.
The strength of our analysis lies in the properties 3, 4 and 5 which are easily verified by induction on .
Here is a couple of anticipated evaluations to whet the reader’s appetite for reading on.
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
2 Evaluation of
Lemma 1**.**
If is a positive integer and is a parameter, real or complex, then
[TABLE]
In particular, we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
Multiply through the recurrence relation by and sum over , obtaining
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
so that we have
[TABLE]
and the result follows.
∎
Note that in the identity of Lemma 1, if we let approach infinity and require to vanish as approaches infinity, then we obtain the generating function for , namely,
[TABLE]
Lemma 2**.**
The rational function
[TABLE]
satisfies the following recursion relation
[TABLE]
Proof.
Write and apply to both sides. ∎
Theorem 2.1**.**
If and are nonnegative integers and a real or complex parameter, then
[TABLE]
where the , , are given recursively by
[TABLE]
Proof.
Apply to both sides of the identity of Lemma 1 and make use of Lemma 2 and the properties 3, 4 and 5 of the operator. ∎
Numerous interesting summation formulas can be obtained directly from Theorem 2.1. By setting , , respectively, we already have some examples:
[TABLE]
corresponding to Vajda [12], Formula (37), proved by induction, which in the limit as gives
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Note that the identity (2.5) subsumes Formulas (A3.52) and (A3.53) of Dunlap [3].
If is the imaginary unit, then using in the summation identity
[TABLE]
allows us to write
[TABLE]
Thus, setting in Theorem 2.1 and making use of identity (2.8), we have the following results for .
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Identities (2.9) and (2.10) are the alternating counterparts of Formulas (34) and (35) of Vajda [12].
Corollary 2.2**.**
If is a nonnegative integer and is a real or complex parameter, then
[TABLE]
In particular, we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Corollary 2.3**.**
If is a nonnegative integer and is a real or complex parameter such that as for all positive integers , then
[TABLE]
Thus, Corollary 2.3 provides the evaluation of generating functions for . A strategy for using probability to evaluate was discussed in reference [1]. Dropping the last two terms in Corollary 2.2, we have
[TABLE]
a result that was also obtained and whose convergence was exhaustively discussed by Glaister [6, 7] for the Fibonacci case, (G=F).
Corollary 2.4**.**
If and are nonnegative integers, then
[TABLE]
where the satisfy the recurrence relation
[TABLE]
Here is a little list from Corollary 2.4.
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Corollary 2.5**.**
If and are nonnegative integers, then
[TABLE]
where the are given recursively by
[TABLE]
Here are a few evaluations.
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
3 Evaluation of
Lemma 3**.**
If and are nonnegative integers and is a parameter, real or complex, then
[TABLE]
where is the smallest integer greater than and the Fibonomial coefficients are defined by
[TABLE]
Proof.
Multiply through the following identity [8, section 1.2.8, Exercise 30] by
[TABLE]
and sum over , obtaining
[TABLE]
which after shifting the index becomes
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
we have
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Clearing brackets, multiplying through by and making the subject, the lemma is proved. ∎
In particular, we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Interesting evaluations can already be obtained from (3.1) and (3.2). For example, at , we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
while gives
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
At , we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
At , we have
[TABLE]
giving
[TABLE]
Evaluation at , gives
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Corollary 3.1** (Generating function for ).**
If is a nonnegative integer and is a parameter, real or complex, such that vanishes as approaches infinity, then
[TABLE]
In particular, the generating functions of and are, respectively,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Lemma 4**.**
The rational function
[TABLE]
satisfies the following recurrence relation
[TABLE]
Proof.
Write
[TABLE]
Apply to both sides to obtain
[TABLE]
from which the result follows.
∎
Theorem 3.2**.**
If , and are nonnegative integers and is a real or complex parameter, then
[TABLE]
where the functions are given recursively by
[TABLE]
for .
Proof.
Apply to both sides of the identity of Lemma 3 and make use of Lemma 4 and the properties 3, 4 and 5 of the operator. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] A. T. Benjamin, J. D. Neer, D. E. Otero and J. A. Sellers, A probabilistic view of certain weighted Fibonacci sums, Fibonacci Quarterly 41 :4 (2003), 360–364.
- 2[2] Robert J. Clarke, A formula for weighted Fibonacci sums, The Mathematical Gazette 87 :509 (2003), 279–280
- 3[3] R. A. Dunlap, The Golden ratio and Fibonacci numbers , World Scientific Press, (1997).
- 4[4] N. Gauthier, Derivation of a formula for ∑ r k x r superscript 𝑟 𝑘 superscript 𝑥 𝑟 \sum r^{k}x^{r} , Fibonacci Quarterly 27 :5 (1989), 402–408.
- 5[5] N. Gauthier, Fibonacci sums of the type ∑ r m F m superscript 𝑟 𝑚 subscript 𝐹 𝑚 \sum r^{m}F_{m} , The Mathematical Gazette 79 :485 (1995), 364–367.
- 6[6] P. Glaister, Fibonacci power series, The Mathematical Gazette 79 :486 (1995), 521–525.
- 7[7] P. Glaister, Fibonacci numbers-finite and infinite series, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 27 :3 (1996), 429–441.
- 8[8] D. Knuth, The art of computer programming , Addison Wesley Longman , (1997).
