Fitting the radial acceleration relation to individual SPARC galaxies
Pengfei Li (1), Federico Lelli (2), Stacy S. McGaugh (1), James M., Schombert (3) ((1) Deparment of Astronomy, Case Western Reserve University,, (2) European Southern Observatory, (3) Department of Physics, University of, Oregon)

TL;DR
This study fits the radial acceleration relation to 175 SPARC galaxies using MCMC, finding a universal force law with minimal residual scatter, supporting MOND predictions and showing no evidence for variation in the acceleration scale.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive MCMC fitting of the RAR to individual galaxies, confirming its universality and consistency with MOND without requiring variation in the acceleration scale.
Findings
Acceptable fits for most galaxies with reasonable parameters.
Residual scatter around fits is only 0.057 dex (~13%).
No evidence found for variation in the critical acceleration scale.
Abstract
Galaxies follow a tight radial acceleration relation (RAR): the acceleration observed at every radius correlates with that expected from the distribution of baryons. We use the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to fit the mean RAR to 175 individual galaxies in the SPARC database, marginalizing over stellar mass-to-light ratio (), galaxy distance, and disk inclination. Acceptable fits with astrophysically reasonable parameters are found for the vast majority of galaxies. The residuals around these fits have an rms scatter of only 0.057 dex (13). This is in agreement with the predictions of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND). We further consider a generalized version of the RAR that, unlike MOND, permits galaxy-to-galaxy variation in the critical acceleration scale. The fits are not improved with this additional freedom: there is no credible indication of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
