The Information Content of Sarbanes-Oxley in Predicting Security Breaches
J. Christopher Westland

TL;DR
This study evaluates how effectively Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) assessments predict security breaches, revealing that SOX 404 audits are more informative than section 302 reports and highlighting discrepancies between management and auditors.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the predictive power of SOX assessments regarding security breaches and compares the informativeness of different SOX sections.
Findings
SOX 404 audits are highly effective in identifying control weaknesses.
SOX 302 controls are associated with a 2.88% reduction in breaches.
Negative SOX 404 attestations correlate with an 8.5% increase in breach frequency.
Abstract
We investigated publicly reported security breaches of internal controls in corporate systems to determine whether SOX assessments are information bearing with respect to breaches which can lead to materially significant losses and misstatements. SOX Section 404 adverse decisions on effectiveness of controls occurred in 100% of credit card data breaches and around 33% of insider breaches. SOX 404 audits provided a contrarian "effective" control decisions on 88% of situations where there was a control breach concerning a portable device. We found that management and SOX 404 auditors do not general agree on the underlying internal control situation at any time; instead the SOX 404 team was likely to discover material weaknesses and "educate" management and internal audit teams about the importance of these control weaknesses. SOX attestations were poor at identifying control weaknesses…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
