Stacked lensing estimators and their covariance matrices: Excess surface mass density vs. Lensing shear
Masato Shirasaki, Masahiro Takada

TL;DR
This paper derives a covariance formula for stacked lensing estimators, showing how weighting schemes affect signal-to-noise ratios and comparing the performance of $ ext{Delta}\Sigma$ and $ ext{gamma}_+$ estimators across different regimes.
Contribution
It provides a new covariance matrix formula for $ ext{Delta}\Sigma$ estimator, optimizing weighting schemes to maximize signal-to-noise in stacked lensing analyses.
Findings
Weighting by $ ext{Sigma}_{ m cr}^{-2}$ maximizes S/N for $ ext{Delta}\Sigma$ in shot noise regime.
$ ext{Delta}\Sigma$ with $ ext{Sigma}_{ m cr}^{-2}$ outperforms $ ext{gamma}_+$ by 5-25% in S/N for certain redshifts.
For low-redshift lenses, $ ext{gamma}_+$ yields higher S/N than $ ext{Delta}\Sigma$.
Abstract
Stacked lensing is a powerful means of measuring the average mass distribution around large-scale structure tracers. There are two stacked lensing estimators used in the literature, denoted as and , which are related as , where is the critical surface mass density for each lens-source pair ( and are lens and source redshifts, respectively). In this paper we derive a formula for the covariance matrix of -estimator focusing on `weight' function to improve the signal-to-noise (). We assume that the lensing fields and the distribution of lensing objects obey the Gaussian statistics. With this formula, we show that, if background galaxy shapes are weighted by an amount of , the -estimator maximizes the in the shot noise…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
