Objective Bayesian analysis of neutrino masses and hierarchy
Alan F. Heavens, Elena Sellentin

TL;DR
This paper develops a minimally informative Bayesian prior for neutrino mass analysis, finding the normal hierarchy slightly favored but inconclusive, and emphasizes the need for better data to determine neutrino properties.
Contribution
It introduces an objective Bayesian reference prior for neutrino mass analysis, reducing prior bias and clarifying data requirements for hierarchy determination.
Findings
Normal hierarchy slightly favored with 5.1:1 odds
Future cosmological data can provide conclusive evidence
Inverted hierarchy detection remains challenging with current uncertainties
Abstract
Given the precision of current neutrino data, priors still impact noticeably the constraints on neutrino masses and their hierarchy. To avoid our understanding of neutrinos being driven by prior assumptions, we construct a prior that is mathematically minimally informative. Using the constructed uninformative prior, we find that the normal hierarchy is favoured but with inconclusive posterior odds of 5.1:1. Better data is hence needed before the neutrino masses and their hierarchy can be well constrained. We find that the next decade of cosmological data should provide conclusive evidence if the normal hierarchy with negligible minimum mass is correct, and if the uncertainty in the sum of neutrino masses drops below 0.025 eV. On the other hand, if neutrinos obey the inverted hierarchy, achieving strong evidence will be difficult with the same uncertainties. Our uninformative prior was…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
