A Finite-Model-Theoretic View on Propositional Proof Complexity

TL;DR

This paper reveals deep connections between propositional proof systems and finite model theory, providing logical characterizations of their expressive power and enabling new lower bound techniques.

Contribution

It establishes precise logical characterizations of several propositional proof systems, linking them to fixed-point logics and advancing the understanding of proof complexity.

Findings

Horn resolution equals least fixed-point logic

Bounded-width resolution captures existential least fixed-point logic

Polynomial calculus with bounded degree characterizes fixed-point logic with counting

Abstract

We establish new, and surprisingly tight, connections between propositional proof complexity and finite model theory. Specifically, we show that the power of several propositional proof systems, such as Horn resolution, bounded-width resolution, and the monomial calculus of bounded degree, can be characterised in a precise sense by variants of fixed-point logics that are of fundamental importance in descriptive complexity theory. Our main results are that Horn resolution has the same expressive power as least fixed-point logic, that bounded-width resolution captures existential least fixed-point logic, and that the polynomial calculus with bounded degree over the rationals solves precisely the problems definable in fixed-point logic with counting. We also study the bounded-degree polynomial calculus. Over the rationals, it captures fixed-point logic with counting if we restrict the bit-complexity of the coefficients. For unrestricted coefficients, we can only say that the bounded-degree polynomial calculus is at most as powerful as bounded variable infinitary counting logic, but a precise logical characterisation of its power remains an open problem. These connections between logics and proof systems allow us to establish finite-model-theoretic tools for proving lower bounds for the polynomial calculus over the rationals and also over finite fields. This is a corrected version of the paper (arXiv:1802.09377) published originally on January 23, 2019.