Effects of Important Parameters Variations on Computing Eigenspace-Based Minimum Variance Weights for Ultrasound Tissue Harmonic Imaging
Mehdi Haji Heidari, Moein Mozaffarzadeh, Rayyan Manwar, Mohammadreza, Nasiriavanaki

TL;DR
This paper explores how parameter variations in the eigenspace-based minimum variance (EIBMV) beamformer affect resolution and contrast in ultrasound tissue harmonic imaging, demonstrating improved image quality under noisy conditions.
Contribution
It introduces the application of EIBMV beamforming in second harmonic ultrasound imaging and analyzes the impact of key parameters on image quality.
Findings
EIBMV reduces sidelobes and enhances contrast in SHI.
Optimal parameters for EIBMV improve resolution and contrast.
EIBMV maintains high resolution even with strong noise presence.
Abstract
In recent years, the minimum variance (MV) beamforming has been widely studied due to its high resolution and contrast in B-mode Ultrasound imaging (USI). However, the performance of the MV beamformer is degraded at the presence of noise, as a result of the inaccurate covariance matrix estimation which leads to a low quality image. Second harmonic imaging (SHI) provides many advantages over the conventional pulse-echo USI, such as enhanced axial and lateral resolutions. However, the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is a major problem in SHI. In this paper, Eigenspace-based minimum variance (EIBMV) beamformer has been employed for second harmonic USI. The Tissue Harmonic Imaging (THI) is achieved by Pulse Inversion (PI) technique. Using the EIBMV weights, instead of the MV ones, would lead to reduced sidelobes and improved contrast, without compromising the high resolution of the MV…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
