A Low-latency Pipeline for GRB Light Curve and Spectrum using Fermi/GBM Near Real-time Data
Yi Zhao, Binbin Zhang, Shaolin Xiong, Xi Long, Qiang Zhang, Liming, Song, Jianchao Sun, Yuanhao Wang, Hancheng Li, Qingcui Bu, Minzi Feng,, Zhengheng Li, Xing Wen, Bobing Wu, Laiyu Zhang, Yongjie Zhang, Shuangnan, Zhang, Jianxiong Shao

TL;DR
This paper presents a low-latency pipeline that rapidly analyzes Fermi/GBM data to determine GRB properties within 20 minutes, aiding real-time astronomical follow-ups and multi-messenger observations.
Contribution
The authors developed a near real-time pipeline for GRB analysis that significantly reduces latency and has been successfully integrated into follow-up observations.
Findings
Achieves parameter estimation within ~20 minutes post-trigger
T90 and fluence are consistent with catalog results for 90% of GRBs
Enabled timely follow-up observations for GW-associated GRBs
Abstract
Rapid response and short time latency are very important for Time Domain Astronomy, such as the observations of Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs) and electromagnetic (EM) counterparts of gravitational waves (GWs). Based on the near real-time Fermi/GBM data, we developed a low-latency pipeline to automatically calculate the temporal and spectral properties of GRBs. With this pipeline, some important parameters can be obtained, such as T90 and fluence, within ~20 minutes after the GRB trigger. For ~90% GRBs, T90 and fluence are consistent with the GBM catalog results within 2 sigma errors. This pipeline has been used by the Gamma-ray Bursts Polarimeter (POLAR) and the Insight Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (Insight-HXMT) to follow up the bursts of interest. For GRB 170817A, the first EM counterpart of GW events detected by Fermi/GBM and INTEGRAL/SPI-ACS, the pipeline gave T90 and spectral…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
