Tests of Gravitational Symmetries with Pulsar Binary J1713+0747
W. W. Zhu, G. Desvignes, N. Wex, R. N. Caballero, D. J. Champion, P., B. Demorest, J. A. Ellis, G. H. Janssen, M. Kramer, A. Krieger, L. Lentati,, D. J. Nice, S. M. Ransom, I. H. Stairs, B. W. Stappers, J. P. W. Verbiest, Z., Arzoumanian, C. G. Bassa, M. Burgay, I. Cognard

TL;DR
This paper tests key aspects of the strong equivalence principle using pulsar binary data, providing new constraints on gravitational theories and symmetry violations in strongly self-gravitating systems.
Contribution
It presents the first direct tests of UFF and $ ilde{eta}_3$ using pulsar binaries, improving constraints on gravitational symmetries beyond Solar system limits.
Findings
Constraint on the variation of G: $rac{\dot{G}}{G} = (-0.1 \\pm 0.9) \times 10^{-12}$ yr$^{-1}$
Bounds on UFF violation: $|\Delta| < 0.002$
Limits on $ ilde{eta}_3$: $-3 \times 10^{-20} < \hat{\alpha}_3 < 4 \times 10^{-20}$
Abstract
Symmetries play an important role in modern theories of gravity. The strong equivalence principle (SEP) constitutes a collection of gravitational symmetries which are all implemented by general relativity. Alternative theories, however, are generally expected to violate some aspects of SEP. We test three aspects of SEP using observed change rates in the orbital period and eccentricity of binary pulsar J1713+0747: 1. the gravitational constant's constancy as part of locational invariance of gravitation; 2. the post-Newtonian parameter in gravitational Lorentz invariance; 3. the universality of free fall (UFF) for strongly self-gravitating bodies. Based on the pulsar timing result of the combined dataset from the North American Nanohertz Gravitational Observatory (NANOGrav) and the European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA), we find $\dot{G}/G = (-0.1 \pm 0.9) \times…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
