Measuring the Demand Effects of Formal and Informal Communication : Evidence from Online Markets for Illicit Drugs
Luis Armona

TL;DR
This paper investigates how formal and informal online communications influence demand in illicit drug markets, showing that both types of communication significantly affect consumer behavior and that vendor credibility and message volume also play roles.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the impact of online communication channels on demand in illicit markets, highlighting the roles of vendor credibility and message volume.
Findings
Communication on reviews and forums equally influences demand
Vendor commitment to disclosure reduces communication's impact
Demand increases with message volume and positive sentiment
Abstract
I present evidence that communication between marketplace participants is an important influence on market demand. I find that consumer demand is approximately equally influenced by communication on both formal and informal networks- namely, product reviews and community forums. In addition, I find empirical evidence of a vendor's ability to commit to disclosure dampening the effect of communication on demand. I also find that product demand is more responsive to average customer sentiment as the number of messages grows, as may be expected in a Bayesian updating framework.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMedia Influence and Politics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
