Probing the network structure of health deficits in human aging
Spencer G. Farrell, Arnold B. Mitnitski, Olga Theou, Kenneth Rockwood,, and Andrew D. Rutenberg

TL;DR
This study models human aging as a scale-free network of health deficits, revealing how network connectivity influences the informativeness of health attributes and their damage progression, with implications for aging prediction.
Contribution
It introduces a disassortative scale-free network model of human aging that aligns with observational data and explains the damage sequence of health deficits.
Findings
Higher-ranked nodes are more informative about mortality.
Laboratory deficits damage earlier than clinical deficits.
Network topology affects the progression and informativeness of health deficits.
Abstract
We confront a network model of human aging and mortality in which nodes represent health attributes that interact within a scale-free network topology, with observational data that uses both clinical and laboratory (pre-clinical) health deficits as network nodes. We find that individual health attributes exhibit a wide range of mutual information with mortality and that, with a re- construction of their relative connectivity, higher-ranked nodes are more informative. Surprisingly, we find a broad and overlapping range of mutual information of laboratory measures as compared with clinical measures. We confirm similar behavior between most-connected and least-connected model nodes, controlled by the nearest-neighbor connectivity. Furthermore, in both model and observational data, we find that the least-connected (laboratory) nodes damage earlier than the most-connected (clinical)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
