Energy consumption for ion transport in a segmented Paul trap
A. Tobalina, J. Alonso, J. G. Muga

TL;DR
This paper models and analyzes the energy costs of ion transport in a segmented Paul trap using shortcuts to adiabaticity, emphasizing the importance of including control system effects for accurate energy assessment.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive model that accounts for control system energy costs and energy shifts, providing a more accurate evaluation of ion transport energy consumption.
Findings
Control system energy significantly impacts total energy cost.
Including energy shifts of the potential minimum improves cost estimation.
Comparison between macroscopic control and microscopic ion energy reveals key similarities.
Abstract
There is recent interest in determining energy costs of shortcuts to adiabaticity (STA), but different definitions of "cost" have been used. We demonstrate the importance of taking into account the Control System (CS) for a fair assessment of energy flows and consumptions. We model the energy consumption and power to transport an ion by a STA protocol in a multisegmented Paul trap. The ion is driven by an externally controlled, moving harmonic oscillator. Even if no net ion- energy is gained at destination, setting the time-dependent control parameters is a macroscopic operation that costs energy and results in energy dissipation for the short time scales implied by the intrinsically fast STA processes. The potential minimum is displaced by modulating the voltages on control (dc) electrodes. A secondary effect of the modulation, usually ignored as it does not affect the ion dynamics, is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
