Complexity of the Steiner Network Problem with Respect to the Number of Terminals
Eduard Eiben, Du\v{s}an Knop, Fahad Panolan, and Ond\v{r}ej Such\'y

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of the Directed Steiner Network problem, providing new algorithms for graphs with bounded genus and establishing tight hardness bounds related to the number of terminals.
Contribution
It introduces an algorithm with complexity depending on the genus of the graph and proves a matching hardness result, closing the gap in complexity understanding.
Findings
Algorithm with complexity f(R)·|V(G)|^{O(c_g·|T|)} for bounded genus graphs
No f(R)·|V(G)|^{o(|T|^2/ log |T|)} algorithm exists for general graphs unless ETH fails
Complexity depends critically on the genus and number of terminals
Abstract
In the Directed Steiner Network problem we are given an arc-weighted digraph , a set of terminals , and an (unweighted) directed request graph with . Our task is to output a subgraph of the minimum cost such that there is a directed path from to in for all . It is known that the problem can be solved in time [Feldman&Ruhl, SIAM J. Comput. 2006] and cannot be solved in time even if is planar, unless Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails [Chitnis et al., SODA 2014]. However, as this reduction (and other reductions showing hardness of the problem) only shows that the problem cannot be solved in time unless ETH fails, there is a significant gap in the complexity with respect to in the exponent. We show that Directed Steiner Network is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
